×

CAESAREAN SECTION INCIDENTS AND COST IN WEST SUMATRA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC HOSPITALS UNDER INA CBGS SYSTEM

Aladin Aladin, Martga Bella Rahimi
This article has been read 184 times.
This PDF has been read 79 times.

Abstract

Since its first launched in 2014, many hospitals claimed to have financial loss due to inequality between hospital real tariff and BPJS payment. It is important to identify the characteristics and trends of caesarean deliveries in hospitals prior to measuring the efficiency level under INA-CBGs system. However, until now there is yet to be a descriptive study to understand this issue comprehensively. To fill this research gap, this study aimed to compare caesarean section incidents and costs between private and public hospitals in West Sumatra, Indonesia. This study is expected to describe real situation related to caesarean cases and explore the preference of patients in the province for caesarean deliveries. This study was retrospective and cross-sectional design of caesarean section in all West Sumatran hospitals under INA-CBGs system. The data used was taken from BPJS region West Sumatra-Riau-Jambi for period 2016 to 2018. During that period, almost 59 thousand caesarean section were performed, of which 64% in private hospitals and 36% in public hospitals. Within three years, caesarean cases in private hospitals were almost doubled while public hospitals showed a decreasing trend. In 2018, three quarter of caesarean costs was paid by BPJS to private hospitals while public hospitals only received a quarter of total costs.

Full Text:

PDF

References

World Health Organization. Appropriate Technology for Birth. Lancet [Internet]. 1985 Aug;326(8452):436–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673685927503

Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-shun W, Thomas J, Look P Van, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:98–113.

MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean Birth in the United States: Epidemiology, Trends, and Outcomes. Clin Perinatol [Internet]. 2008 Jun;35(2):293–307. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095510808000225

Comas M, Català L, Sala M, Payà A, Sala A, Del Amo E, et al. Descriptive analysis of childbirth healthcare costs in an area with high levels of immigration in Spain. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2011 Dec 15;11(1):77. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/77

Katikireddi S V., Gorman DR, Leyland AH. A comparison of trends in caesarean section rates in former communist (transition) countries and other European countries. Eur J Public Health [Internet]. 2013 Jun;23(3):381–3. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurpub/cks165

Belizan JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S, Showalter E, Griffin A, et al. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ [Internet]. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1397–402. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1397

De Almeida S, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Da Silva AAM, Ribeiro VS. Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2008 Dec;24(12):2909–18. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2008001200020&lng=en&tlng=en

Vieira GO, Fernandes LG, de Oliveira NF, Silva LR, Vieira TDO. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2015 Dec 5;15(1):132. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0570-8

Gonzalez-Perez GJ. Caesarean sections in Mexico: are there too many? Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2001 Mar 1;16(1):62–7. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/heapol/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/heapol/16.1.62

Cavallaro FL, Cresswell JA, França GV, Victora CG, Barros AJ, Ronsmans C. Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(12):914-922D.

Sepehri A, Guliani H. Regional Gradients in Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates: Evidence from Five Countries in Asia. Birth. 2017;44(1):11–20.

Verma V, Vishwakarma RK, Nath DC, Khan HTA, Prakash R, Abid O. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in South and South-East Asian women. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(3):1–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229906

Hu Y, Tao H, Cheng Z. Caesarean Sections in Beijing, China – Results from a Descriptive Study. Das Gesundheitswes [Internet]. 2015 Jul 3;78(01):e1–5. Available from: http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0035-1549937

Qin C, Zhou M, Callaghan WM, Posner SF, Zhang J, Berg CJ, et al. Clinical indications and determinants of the rise of cesarean section in three hospitals in rural China. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(7):1484–90.

Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional, Badan Pusat Statistik, Kementerian Kesehatan, USAID. Survey Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia. Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia. 2017.

Nababan HY, Hasan M, Marthias T, Dhital R, Rahman A, Anwar I. Trends and inequities in use of maternal health care services in Indonesia, 1986–2012. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:11–24.

Wirakusumah FF. Maternal and Perinatal Mortality/Morbidity Associated with Cesarean Section in Indonesia. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 1995;21(5):475–81.

Mawarti Y, Utarini A, Hakimi M. Maternal care quality in near miss and maternal mortality in an academic public tertiary hospital in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–8.

Santoso BI, Trisnantoro L, Hendra Y. Cesarean section tariff analysis based on Indonesian case base groups in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Adv Sci Lett [Internet]. 2017 Apr 1;23(4):3590–3. Available from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1166/asl.2017.9188

BPJS Kesehatan. Laporan tahunan peleksanaan BPJS tahun 2017. 2018.

Soejono CH, Fitriana I. Perbedaan Lama Masa Rawat, Kualitas Hidup, dan Efektivitas Biaya Perawatan Pasien Geriatri di RSUPNCM Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. eJournal Kedokt Indones. 2018;6(1):24–32.

Ediansyah. Laporan tahunan RSU An-nisa kota Tangerang. 2018.

Widjayanto ADW, Sudiro S, Suryawati C. Kebijakan Penetapan Tarif Seksio Sesarea Tanpa Penyulit dengan Metode Activity Based Costing Berdasarkan ICD-9CM pada Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional di Rumah Sakit XY Kabupaten Kudus Tahun 2016. J Ekon Kesehat Indones. 2017;1(4):151–8.

BPJS Kesehatan Kanwil Sumbar-Riau-Jambi. Jumlah Kasus dan Biaya Terbanyak di Sumatera Barat tahun 2018. 2019.

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No 27 tahun 2014 tentang juknis sistem INA CBGs. 2014.

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No 59 tahun 2014 tentang standard tarif JKN. 2014.