×

ANALYSIS OF VISUAL ATTENTION AMONG SMOKER AND NON-SMOKER BY USING HUMAN EYE TRACKER OF HEALTH GRAPHIC WARNING ON TOBACCO PACKAGE

Rizki Edmi Edison, Yayu Hizza Anisa, Fikry Ravi Fauzy
This article has been read 610 times.
This PDF has been read 79 times.

Abstract

The placement of Health Graphic Warning on tobacco package has been implementing in Indonesia for years. However, the number of smokers in Indonesia is not decreased. Many studies based on interview about perception of Health Graphic Warning gave difference results. This study analysed the visual attention of smokers while looking at tobacco package and compared with non-smoker by using human eye tracker. 50 persons (25 smoker and 25 non-smokers) of 18 – 20 years old adolescents were participated in this study. Image of tobacco package that contained health graphic warning was shown to participants through monitor alternate with neutral image. It revealed that smokers and non-smokers have different pattern where non-smokers will focus to smoking-related disease and smoker will focus to logo of tobacco.

Full Text:

PDF

References

WHO. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. World Heal Organ. 2013;

Kemenkes RI. Infodatin. Situasi Umum Konsumsi Tembakau di Indonesia Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Situasi Umum Konsumsi Tembakau di Indones. 2018;

Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Situasi Umum Konsumsi Tembakau di Indonesia. Pus Data dan Inf Kementrian Kesehat RI. 2018;

Villanti AC, Cantrell J, Pearson JL, Vallone DM, Rath JM. Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior among U.S. young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;

Ratih SP, Susanna D. Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings on changes in smoking behaviour in Asia: a literature review. BMC Public Health. 2018;

Brewer NT, Hall MG, Noar SM, Parada H, Stein-Seroussi A, Bach LE, et al. Effect of pictorial cigarette packwarnings on changes in smoking behavior a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;

Fooken J, Spering M. Decoding go/no-go decisions from eye movements. J Vis. 2019;

Carter BT, Luke SG. Best practices in eye tracking research. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020;

Munir M. Pengetahuan dan Sikap Remaja Tentang Risiko Merokok pada Santri Mahasiswa di Asrama UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Klorofil. 2018;

Fauzia WN. FAKTOR PENENTU INTENSI BERPERILAKU TIDAK MEROKOK PADA REMAJA PUTRA DI SMA NEGERI 1 TUBAN TAHUN 2015. J PROMKES. 2017;

Kebijakan J, Indonesia K, Sandra C, Administrasi B, Kesehatan K, Masyarakat K. Effectiveness Analysis of the Pictorial Health Warning Policy on Cigarette Packs in Lowering the Smoking Behaviour Students of Smk in Jember District. J Kebijak Kesehat Indones. 2016;

Fairuz Izdihar D, Ravi Fauzi F, Ayu Aguspa Dita D, Putri Aransih M, Prawiroharjo P, Risman E, et al. Faking Good Among Porn-Addicted Adolescents. In 2019.

Okuyama F. Eye-tracking infra-red optometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;

Reingold EM. Eye tracking research and technology: Towards objective measurement of data quality. Vis cogn. 2014;

Punde PA, Jadhav ME, Manza RR. A study of Eye Tracking Technology and its applications. In: Proceedings - 1st International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Information Management, ICISIM 2017. 2017.

Asan O, Yang Y. Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015;

Kessels LTE, Ruiter RAC. Eye movement responses to health messages on cigarette packages. BMC Public Health. 2012;

Hwang JE, Yang YS, Oh YM, Lee SY, Lee JE, Cho S Il. Differences in visual fxation duration according to the position of graphic health warning labels: An eye-tracking approach. Tob Induc Dis. 2018;